The fascist salute: Eoin O'Duffy, centre, with Alfie Byrne (wearing mayoral chain).
Alfie Byrne, Dublin’s
Fascist Mayor, 1930-1939.
This concise biography examines theDublin mayoralty of the
Irish fascist Alfie Byrne (formally known as Alfred Byrne). A Dubliner, Byrne began his political career as a
supporter of the Irish Parliamentary Party. Coming to the attention of the
newspaper magnate and industrialist William Martin Murphy, Byrne’s career
prospered under Murphy’s patronage. During the 1913 Lockout, Byrne sought to crush
the strike. Dominic Behan records how Byrne was actively engaged in organizing scab labour. Most notoriously, as Yeates has recounted, Byrne was
directly involved in the Catholic Church’s and Ancient Order of Hibernia’s
attempt to prevent striking workers from sending their children abroad to
escape the desperate conditions then prevailing in Dublin. A sectarian Catholic
at heart, Byrne expressed the fear that, should the children be sent abroad, they
would end up in non-Catholic homes. Jim Larkin and James Connolly both wrote
about Byrne’s role in breaking the strike, with Jim Larkin contending (with
reason) that Byrne was corrupt and James Connolly claiming that Byrne was a man 'without principle'.
This biography examines Byrne’s deep involvement withDublin ’s fascist circle. Byrne was a firm political ally of Patrick Belton (a Nazi
supporter) and Oliver J. Flanagan (a virulent anti-Semite, an admirer of Hitler and a proven perjurer). As Padraic Farrell has noted, Alfie
Byrne attended Nazi meetings in Dublin ;
on one occasion, as the Irish Workers’
Voice documented, Byrne sat in a room where ‘the Tricolour and the Swastika of
the fascist murder gang were draped in unholy matrimony.’ Believing that poor
housing conditions were responsible for the radicalisation of the Dublin working classes,
Byrne embraced the paternalistic solutions found in the Papal documents Rerum Novarum and Quadragesimo Anno (a foundation text for fascist corporatism). A well-housed population would be more submissive
population - or so it was hoped. Byrne also denounced any attempt by State
agencies to regulate family life.

(Picture: Alfie Byrne with the Papal Legate Cardinal Lorenzi Lauri (Eucharistic Congress, Dublin, 1932). In 1933 Byrne was granted a private audience with Pope Pius XI. Byrne told Pius of 'the wonderful effects of the Congress on the life of the people and especially on the poor of Dublin, that poor of Dublin that did so much in their own humble but wonderfully characteristic and faithful manner to contribute towards the success of the Congress; that the Congress seems to have given to the poor and the unemployed fresh vigour and courage to bear with resignation their poverty and their trials, and thus bring them nearer to God, and to find in sorrow an instrument of attaining to the riches of eternal life.').
This concise biography examines the
This biography examines Byrne’s deep involvement with
(Picture: Alfie Byrne with the Papal Legate Cardinal Lorenzi Lauri (Eucharistic Congress, Dublin, 1932). In 1933 Byrne was granted a private audience with Pope Pius XI. Byrne told Pius of 'the wonderful effects of the Congress on the life of the people and especially on the poor of Dublin, that poor of Dublin that did so much in their own humble but wonderfully characteristic and faithful manner to contribute towards the success of the Congress; that the Congress seems to have given to the poor and the unemployed fresh vigour and courage to bear with resignation their poverty and their trials, and thus bring them nearer to God, and to find in sorrow an instrument of attaining to the riches of eternal life.').
With the collapse of W. T. Cosgrave’s
government and the onset of the Great Depression, Byrne attached himself to fascist thought. Byrne became a fervent admirer of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco
and Salazar. Byrne was instrumental in the founding of the fascist organisation
The Irish Christian Front (which blamed the world’s economic
problems on a Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracy directed from Moscow; the Irish Christian Front would subsequently influence Father Charles Coughlan and the U.S. Christian Front ). Byrne supported Franco’s coup d’état
against the democratically elected government of Spain , and he addressed (what was then) the largest Far-Right demonstration in Irish history. Supported by the ultra-Catholic broadsheet The Standard (a
pro-Mussolini broadsheet), Byrne took to the streets to forcibly close down
progressive bookstores and libraries. While Byrne allowed the Far Right to hold
meetings at the Dublin Mansion House, he specifically prohibited its use by progressives. As an admirer of the Blueshirts (a paramilitary fascist organisation), Alfie Byrne was involved in raising funds for
Eoin O’Duffy’s pro-Franco Irish Brigade.
To an extent, Byrne was the archetypal parish-pump politician and was seen as such by many of his contemporaries. A wide practitioner of nepotistic appointments, Byrne also enriched himself at the expense of the public coffers. Byrne would do almost any thing for a vote. Patrick Lindsay’s anecdote of Alfie Byrne and Oliver J. Flanagan discussing how to secure the vote of a recently widowed woman testifies to this opportunism.
'The citizens of Dublin are not following the dances of negroes. I challenge you to go into any hotel or ballroom in the city and point out anything that could be described as following the negroes or indecent. It is a slander on the people of Dublin to say they are following the negroes, and nobody has any right to make that charge.' Alfie Byrne on Jazz (1934).
The text recounts Alfie Byrne’s stymieing ofDublin cultural life. James Joyce regarded Byrne as a vain fool, while Harry Kernoff
depicted Byrne as the drunken chancer in his famous engraving Alcoholics Synonymous. Sean O’Casey
despised Byrne and viewed him as one of the major promoters of Irish fascism (most notably in his The Star Turns Red). Dublin progressives regularly found themselves opposing Byrne, especially in regards to Byrne’s support for
heavy film censorship. At least two plays depict Byrne as a self-serving enemy of secular
democracy. More recently, Darran McCann's novel After the Lockout figures Byrne as a cowardly political crook.
Despite his historical importance, Alfie Byrne has remained an under-researched figure. The first major retrospective of his life was showcased at the Little Museum of Dublin last year. This work discusses the Little Museum of Dublin’s extremely problematic permanent exhibition to Alfie Byrne (extraordinarily, it insists on Byrne as a 'hero' and a 'great man') and details the various revisions made to the exhibition. The Little Museum of Dublin is a private registered charity that receives funding from the Ireland Funds, the Irish State, the Matheson Foundation, Guinness (Diageo), the Davy Group and Veolia (Luas), among others. The charity is run by Trevor White, Sarah Costigan and Simon O'Connor.
Finally, and more broadly, this work deals with the development of Irish fascism and the attempt by some modern commentators to severely downplay (or deny outright) the role Irish fascism had on the political, economic, cultural and intellectual life of 1930sDublin and Ireland.
To an extent, Byrne was the archetypal parish-pump politician and was seen as such by many of his contemporaries. A wide practitioner of nepotistic appointments, Byrne also enriched himself at the expense of the public coffers. Byrne would do almost any thing for a vote. Patrick Lindsay’s anecdote of Alfie Byrne and Oliver J. Flanagan discussing how to secure the vote of a recently widowed woman testifies to this opportunism.
'The citizens of Dublin are not following the dances of negroes. I challenge you to go into any hotel or ballroom in the city and point out anything that could be described as following the negroes or indecent. It is a slander on the people of Dublin to say they are following the negroes, and nobody has any right to make that charge.' Alfie Byrne on Jazz (1934).
The text recounts Alfie Byrne’s stymieing of
Despite his historical importance, Alfie Byrne has remained an under-researched figure. The first major retrospective of his life was showcased at the Little Museum of Dublin last year. This work discusses the Little Museum of Dublin’s extremely problematic permanent exhibition to Alfie Byrne (extraordinarily, it insists on Byrne as a 'hero' and a 'great man') and details the various revisions made to the exhibition. The Little Museum of Dublin is a private registered charity that receives funding from the Ireland Funds, the Irish State, the Matheson Foundation, Guinness (Diageo), the Davy Group and Veolia (Luas), among others. The charity is run by Trevor White, Sarah Costigan and Simon O'Connor.
Finally, and more broadly, this work deals with the development of Irish fascism and the attempt by some modern commentators to severely downplay (or deny outright) the role Irish fascism had on the political, economic, cultural and intellectual life of 1930s
© Niall Gillespie 2016.
Supplement. A brief review of Trevor White’s Alfie: The Life and Times of Alfie Byrne (Dublin: Penguin, 2017).
Trevor White is currently the Director of the Little Museum of Dublin, a registered charity (educational) that partly relies on corporate sponsorship and government funding (and unpaid internships and the now (thankfully) defunct exploitative Job-Bridge scheme). White himself is probably best known for his role as the Dubliner magazine’s owner and editor during that publication’s more contentious period (the Tiger Woods controversy/ Elin Nordegren libel, the ‘Negro’ and ‘darkies’ controversy, the black doctor/cancer controversy etc.). The Little Museum (LDM) has been running an exhibition on Alfie Byrne for some time now. Byrne’s son, Paddy Byrne (former TD), donated some of his father’s papers and possessions to the LDM and White has produced what amounts to an exhibition catalog.
White’s biography of Byrne is sympathetic to its subject. To a lot of Dubliners, and Irish people, Alfie Byrne is the archetypal corrupt politician, a reactionary popular with a large portion of the more servile constituents but despised by the rest, a forerunner to the likes of Jackie Healy Ray, a man who spewed a political dynasty and left the country to pick up the mess and foot the bill. White begs to differ, casting Byrne as, on balance, a good man out to do laudable things. This biography, while not hagiography, often skirts close to it, and the reader is left with the impression that it is an exercise in ingratiating himself with the subject’s descendants and LMD donors. And this probably accounts for the flatness of the book. One gets the sense that often the author is trying to enthuse himself in spite of himself. White appears to be intent on demonstrating an excitement and admiration for Byrne that he doesn’t quite wholly believe himself.
A proper review of this book would require many pages, so a few points are given instead.
First and foremost this book omits much, and it’s debatable as to whether the author is unaware of certain facts, or if aware of them, omits them as inconvenient to his general thesis. Among the most noticeable is White’s failure to acknowledge Sean O’Casey’s play The Star Turns Red (published 1940; begun 1937). O’Casey had an audience with Alfie Byrne in 1927 and based the fascist mayor of the play directly on Byrne (as O’Casey literary scholars have regularly pointed out). The Star Turns Red is located in Dublin and concerns the Christian Front (based on the Irish Christian Front), the fascist Saffron Shirts (based on the Irish fascist organization the Blueshirts) and Red Jim (i.e. James Larkin). This play merits a chapter in itself, but White is utterly silent on it, preferring to spend two pages wondering whether Byrne influenced the Batman comic series (a question that could have been answered quickly with two letters).
Where the biography does acknowledge the nastier elements of Byrne’s character it often tries to palliate them, excuse them, qualify them or refer to them briefly and hastily move on. For example, the anti-Jazz movement. That movement was a failure. It was led, and supported by, the more extreme wing of the population. But whereas most in this minority movement saw it as an anti-foreign music campaign (with a nod to the import-substitution and home-manufacturing debates that occurred during the Great Depression, etc.) few racialized the question as Alfie Byrne did. Jazz was objectionable to Byrne for the very reason that it was the intellectual product of black musicians.
Likewise, while White is content to talk about that Dublin folklore that views Byrne positively, White basically ignores that other Dublin folklore about Byrne, the one that posits him as a corrupt and deeply selfish individual who used his supposed anti-poverty crusade to enrich himself. These stories are plentiful, but White is either unaware of them (a possibility) or just elides them. White endlessly repeats that Byrne was nicknamed the ‘shaking hand of Dublin’ but he fails to mention that this phrase had an ironic double-edge to it. Byrne shook a lot of hands, but his hands, Dubliners said, also shook for want of (or excess of) a drink (White’s biography insists that Byrne was a teetotaler; he became one, but he certainly didn’t begin as one as Kernoff and Curtis, amongst others, attest to). Part of the problem stems from White’s over-reliance on information given him by Paddy Byrne, Alfie Byrne’s son. Paddy, who admits that he didn’t know his father well (his father being a workaholic among other things) views his father far too uncritically. White doesn’t mention Alfie Byrne’s interaction with Patrick Pearse, he doesn’t mention that James Connolly thought Byrne utterly corrupt, that Alice Milligan wanted to slap Byrne across the face. Kate O’Brien, novelist and anti-fascist, is absent from the biography, as is Signe Toksvig. W. B. Yeats’ fascinating relationship with Byrne (he courted Byrne during his fascist phase and blasted him in his late work On the Boiler) is omitted, as are Byrne’s strong links with William Martin Murphy and his son. Jack B. Yeats’ incisive remark about Byrne (that he willed himself to be whatever he wanted) is not quoted. Byrne’s double-dealing in controversy over the eminent Celticist Kuno Meyer is not referenced (Byrne promised support to both sides, and then ran when the votes were being cast). Why isn’t Liam O’Flaherty in this biography? Or Peadar O’Donnell? White mentions that Byrne opposed conscription during World War I. That is true. But Byrne was very active in the military recruitment campaign (as were most Redmonites) and there’s a poem from the era that berates Byrne for this. White insists that Byrne was a pacifist; rather we should note that Byrne was a cheerleader for war and Empire and had no scruples about leading men to the abattoirs of Gallipoli and the Somme.
The next major problem is that of Alfie Byrne and fascism. In the age of White Nationalism, Le Pen, Charlottesville, Trump, Jobbik, the AfD, Golden Dawn, Wilders, the PP, etc., an author needs to tread carefully here. Byrne adhered to fascism. It’s an objective fact. Byrne admired Hitler, Franco, Mussolini and Salazar. He was happy to give the fascist salute, to raise money for Franco, to attend dinners given by the Nazis in Dublin, to present gifts to Mussolini’s fleet, to sponsor and speak for the Irish Christian Front (an organization that believed the Great Depression was engineered by the Bolsheviks, Jewish financiers, the Masons and a miscellany of secularists). The Irish Christian Front (ICF) was, as Behan pointed out, a far-right group that even the regular, church-going conservatives avoided. Byrne’s secretary, an interesting figure, doubled as his secretary and the secretary for the ICF. For a period the ICF’s mailing address was Byrne’s office in the Mansion House. White insists that the Blueshirts were not fascist or anti-Semitic. To prove this point he references the opinions of the revisionist historian Anne Dolan (Eunan O’Halpin’s disciple) whose work has always been sympathetic to the Redmonite, Cumann na nGaedheal and Fine Gael tradition. White also quotes Fearghal McGarry, whose biography of O’Duffy claims that he wasn’t a fascist in the proper sense (despite O’Duffy claiming he was one and offering Hitler Irish troops to fight the Soviets). Mike Cronin is also (not surprisingly) referenced. Those who disagree with this historiographical narrative (both Irish and international) are not given space.
Fine Gael’s roots were various, and fascism was one strand. Fine Gael is now a party in the Christian Democrat tradition (with a propensity to coalesce with Ireland’s conservative Labour Party) and contemporary revisionist have worked assiduously to downplay the fascism that informed its birth and that embarrasses them. The Blueshirts attracted, among others, large portions of ex-British military men, and Byrne’s constituency contained a disproportionate number of these. White also nods to the (Irish) Jewish Representative Council (JRC) which states that as far as they are aware (from a quick ask around), Byrne was not anti-Semitic. Considering that Byrne’s contemporaries from the 1930s are mainly all dead now this means little. The JRC (an all-male body) recently attracted attention for defending Kevin Myers after his anti-Semitic comments regarding Venessa Feltz (needless to say Feltz spoke of how she found Meyers comments deeply anti-Semitic. Myers had previously argued that the only thing Africa had given the world was AIDS. Myers has been invited to speak at the LMD various times). The Jewish population in Ireland in the 1930s was overwhelmingly anti-Franco and was at the forefront of the campaign to raise funds for the republican side during the Spanish Civil War (in fact, it’s difficult to find even one member of the Jewish community that was pro-Franco). They were acutely aware that if Franco won, international fascism would strengthen immeasurably. The foundation of the Irish Christian Front worried the Irish Jewish Community for obvious reason (they expressed their deep concerns to Archbishop Byrne among others). John Carey’s point should always be kept in mind, those who made fascism respectable in the 1930s, those who fostered an intellectual climate favorable to fascism, are directly responsible for the Death Camps of Nazi Germany and the Concentration Camps of Franco’s Spain. It wasn't only guns that murdered Lorca.
Another problem with White’s biography is the question of sources. The archive that Paddy Byrne donated to the Little Museum of Dublin is used heavily. Other sources are utterly neglected (the Archbishop Byrne and Archbishop McQuaid’s archives, the archives of Oliver J. Flanagan, Patrick Belton, etc.) Printed material suffers too. Catholic publications of the period, where Byrne figures repeatedly, are not referenced or quoted from (Catholic Standard, Sacred Heart Messenger, etc.).
What good can be said of Alfie Byrne? He opposed the industrial schools and he advocated votes for women. The former White deals with well, the latter far too briefly.
White finishes his biography by wondering why there isn’t a statue in Dublin to Alfie Byrne. How would the sculptor fashion it? Byrne giving the fascist salute? Byrne kowtowing to a Cardinal or the Pope? Byrne smashing the recordings of black musicians? Byrne leading a reactionary mob to destroy a bookstore? Today’s Dubliners wouldn’t stand for it. We may have named a public bridge after Matt Talbot (Byrne’s ideal citizen), but that wouldn’t happen in 2017. There was a monument to Byrne but, being made of wood, it rotted (a rather too-easy metaphor for the afterlife of his reputation). He still has a pub named after him operated by Galway Bay Brewery (another pub named after him renamed itself recently) and a road bears his name. Dubliners still talk proudly of Rosie Hackett, of Noel Browne, of Big Jim Larkin. Byrne is barely remembered, he is neither a folk-hero nor a model for emulation. Few quote him, few tell their children to follow his example.
White’s biography of Alfie Byrne is emblazoned with an enthusiastic nihil obstat from Joe Duffy, but it’s difficult to share Joe’s joy. This book should have been rigorously peer-reviewed prior to publishing, and Penguin ought to have removed the padding that disrupts all the chapters (well-worn anecdotes, oft-repeated historical morsels, endlessly recycled bon mots, etc.). The font size of this book is large, and had the publishers trimmed the fat and reduced the lettering it would’ve made for a sharper, more compact and more readable book. White’s style is often pleasantly conversational and accessible, and the editors should have brought this out more. In summation, more misses than hits, and this is a pity, because the author has far better in him.
© Niall Gillespie 2017.